I recently was asked to write some
content marketing entitled ‘Why a re-make of The Sound of Music is a terrible,
terrible idea.’ Did you all know that
NBC have just aired a new live version of The Sound of Music with, country
& western star, Carrie Underwood as Maria? They only gave me 500 words for
my opinion, which for a subject so dear to my heart, was simply not enough. So I thought it was rather blog worthy!
Is Roger & Hammerstein’s ‘The
Sound of Music’ out of date and in need of a Goq Wan make over?
Well, this NBC re-make has prompted
a dramatic response in the Twitter-sphere and with Julie Andrews fans
alike. One blogger just wrote
“Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo” for about 2,000 characters!
I have to say that I agree. We like
our classic movie musicals to remain just that – classic. I am only just digesting the news that they
are making a new Annie movie after seeing a picture of Cameron Diaz as Miss
Hannigan and Jamie Foxx as Daddy Warbucks. I respect both Diaz and Foxx, but in
my eyes they can’t hold a candle to the wonderful Carol Burnett and Albert
Finney. And now, Julie Andrews is being re-modelled, who’s next.......? Howard
Keel? Bless his beautiful hide - Hell,
no!
I don’t think it is just us musical
theatre geeks, nourished from a young age on these movies, who are the only
protesters to these re-makes. ‘The Sound of Music’ is a firm, family favourite,
it may provoke an eye-roll when it appears in the TV listings EVERY Christmas
Day but there’s a reason for its inclusion.
It is a brilliant film. Yahoo.com
created a list of classic films that shouldn’t be touched in this era of money
making re-makes, calling them ‘The Untouchables.’ They included ‘When Harry Met Sally,’ ‘Annie
Hall’ and ‘Casablanca’ and surely anything with Julie Andrews in should be on
it too, (well, maybe not The Princess Diaries.)
Whose childhood soundtrack,
especially in my line of work, doesn’t include the glorious voice of Julie
Andrews? Carrie Underwood may have a great voice but I doubt she’ll promote the
same feelings of nostalgia. We love this movie for hitch-kicks holding a guitar
case, lederhosen and Liesel’s pink gazebo dress!
16 going on 17.....
Time matures and moves on. Fans of
movies grow up and their tastes change. I understand this. NBC said they wanted
to make their ‘Sound of Music’ appeal to a modern audience by “bringing the
story up to date.” Writer Ashley Fetter
from TheAtlantic.com suggested that the disciplinarian father storyline was
old-fashioned and could be updated by perhaps exploring the modern idea that
Von Trapp
“is just too heartbroken to interact with them (his children)”
has
she not seen the original film???? Christopher Plummer invented ‘intense pain
behind the eyes yearning’ way before Colin Firth even donned Mr Darcy’s
breeches. Von Trapp’s repressed feelings
are a modern therapists dream.
I’m not sure how well NBC achieved
this premise; the promotional photos showed an air-brushed Von-Brady Bunch
scene. Like many others, NBC seems to have mistaken this classic tale to be a
twee and saccharine view of the past.
The non musical story of the Von
Trapp is much darker and the recent production at Regents Park proved the story
to be highly political. It included all the nostalgic movie touches but really
highlighted the historical context.
History shouldn’t be brought up to date, it is history. New audiences
should be able to understand World War II, the Nazi Party and the Holocaust in
their true context and it shouldn’t be sugar-coated or made easier to digest.
It was a horrific moment in history that mustn’t be dumbed down for modern
audiences.
I have confidence, not just in
sunshine bit also, in people. Modern audiences are not stupid and should be
challenged just as people have been by culture for ‘a thousand years.’ By
re-working classics are film producers suggesting that society can only able to
appreciate things that are similar to our lives today? Are we too
short-sighted? Or have they just run out of ideas?
The recent re-writing of Jane
Austen’s novels has provoked a similar mixed reaction. Does giving the Dashwood
girls social media accounts make their story more accessible? Is it too much to hope that we can appreciate
the stories of family, love and life from Austen’s own pen and without a
soundtrack by 1 Direction? Writer, Elizabeth Day from The Observer brilliantly
said
“I don’t need to read about Mr Knightley listening to Arctic Monkeys in his iPod to be convinced that Jane Austen is ‘relevant.’ I already know that she is.”
I believe that the Von Trapp story
is equally relevant and therefore doesn’t need modernising. But what about the argument that a musical is
‘re-worked’ every time a new production is done on stage?
We are
used to seeing different productions; we expect to see musicals on stage. Their
interpretations are applauded and remembered but never as definitive as on
celluloid. Films get re-watched and re-watched which can define images into our
minds. Productions of The Sound of Music are nearly always loyal to tradition,
you never see Maria Von Trapp leaving a detention centre and the family
climbing the Pennines to escape Thatcher.
I hope
this new live American version was enjoyed by a new audience but I pray that it
will inspire them to watch the original.